MEASURING ANXIETY TOWARDS RESEARCH AND THESIS WRITING AMONG ISLAMIC COLLEGE STUDENTS: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30829/tar.v30i1.2414

Abstract

It is unquestionable that research and thesis writing anxiety has negative impacts on academic success. Such academic anxiety needs a serious concern by measuring it as a beginning step to determine appropriate research and thesis writing strategies. Therefore, this study aimed at measuring the types and levels concerning anxiety towards research and undergraduate thesis writing among students in an Islamic college. Through a mixed-methods design, 450 students from various majors at a state-owned college were asked to complete a questionnaire and 10 students were involved in a semi-structured interview. The quantitative data were analyzed by determining means, SD, and frequency levels and a content analysis was applied to analyze qualitative data. The results revealed perceived utility and competence as the most common type experienced by students during a field research and thesis writing. On the other hand, the students are able to work with library-related practice as it has the lowest mean score. Regarding qualitative result, it is stated that there are problem that emerge during the field research and thesis writing, including fear of writing, library, statistics, and field research. Fortunately, the students are able to cope with the problems by undertaking several related strategies, including conducting regular practice, comprehending online resources, and utilizing online application. In short, it is implied that such academic anxiety can be avoided by the students and it is recommended that future research has to focus on determining research and thesis writing strategies.

Author Biography

Heri Mudra, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci

Heri Mudra is a senior English lecturer at English Language Department of Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci. He has published in several reputable international journals and attended international conferences. His research interests include ELT methods, teaching English with technology, applied linguistics, and action research. He is a doctoral student in Education Program at Universitas Jambi, Indonesia.

References

Albertyn, R., & Bennett, K. (2021). Containing and harnessing uncertainty during postgraduate research supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(4), 661–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1775559

Armin, D.S., & Siregar, A.M.P. (2021). EFL teacher’s pedagogical beliefs in teaching at an Indonesian university. Jurnal Tarbiyah, 28(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/tar.v28i2.1119

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality at university. Society for Research into Higher Education, Buckingham, England. 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.839332

Bond, M., Buntins K., Bedenlier S., Zawacki-Richter O., Kerres M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Chan, C. K. Y., Wong, H. Y. H., & Luo, J. (2021). An exploratory study on assessing reflective writing from teachers’ perspectives. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(4), 706–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1773769

Chan, H., Mazzucchelli, T. G., & Rees, C. S. (2021). The battle-hardened academic: an exploration of the resilience of university academics in the face of ongoing criticism and rejection of their research. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1765743

Chiesi, F., Primi, C., & Carmona, J. (2011). Measuring Statistics Anxiety: Cross-Country Validity of the Statistical Anxiety Scale (SAS). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(6), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911404985

Delaney, D., Stewart, H., Cameron, R., Cardell, E., Carruthers, S., Love, A., Pearson, A., & Calleja, P. (2020). Supporting the development of program leaders in higher education: An action research case study. Australian Journal of Career Development, 29(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416220927796

Dewaele, J.-M., Witney, J., Saito, K., & Dewaele, L. (2018). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 676–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817692161

Durham, J. (2014). Ethical challenges in cross-cultural research: A student researcher’s perspective. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 38, 509–512. https://doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12286

Eckert, J. (2020). “Shoot! Can We Restart the Interview?”: Lessons From Practicing “Uncomfortable Reflexivity.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920963810

Edmonds, W. & Kennedy, T. (2017). Explanatory-sequential approach. In An applied guide to research designs (pp. 196-200). SAGE Publications, Inc, https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781071802779

Fitzpatrick, D., Collier, D. A., Parnther, C., Du, Y., Brehm, C., Willson-Conrad, A., Beach, A., & Hearit, K. (2021). Experimental evidence for a first-year experience course plus mentoring on moderate-income university students’ engagement, achievement, and persistence. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1761303

Fortuna, N.D., Marchela, C., Charolina, B., Febrina, S., Mirza, R. (2022). Efikasi diri dan motivasi berprestasi dalam pembelajaran berbasis online selama masa pandemic Covid-19. Jurnal Tarbiyah, 29(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/tar.v29i1.1347

Guntzviller, L. M., Yale, R. N., & Jensen, J. D. (2016). Foreign Language Communication Anxiety Outside of a Classroom: Scale Validation and Curvilinear Relationship With Foreign Language Use. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(4), 605–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116635743

He, X., Zhou, D., & Zhang, X. (2021). An Empirical Study on Chinese University Students’ English Language Classroom Anxiety With the Idiodynamic Approach. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211037676

Heretick, D. M. L., & Tanguma, J. (2021). Anxiety and Attitudes Toward Statistics and Research Among Younger and Older Nontraditional Adult Learners. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 69(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2020.1784690

Heron, M., Gravett, K., & Yakovchuk, N. (2021). Publishing and flourishing: writing for desire in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1773770

Huang, Y. (2021). Doctoral writing for publication. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(4), 753–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1789073

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260

Jan, S. U., Anwar, M. A., & Warraich, N. F. (2020). The relationship between emotional intelligence, library anxiety, and academic achievement among the university students. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(1), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618790629

Kondowe, C., & Booyens M. (2014). A student’s experience of gaining access for qualitative research. Social Work, 50, 146–152. https://doi:10.15270/50-1-17

Li, Z., & Liu, H. (2021). Mixed Methods: Interviews, Surveys, and Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(1), 138–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820950858

Liu, M., & Wu, B. (2021). Teaching Anxiety and Foreign Language Anxiety Among Chinese College English Teachers. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016556

Medeiros, P. (2017). A guide for graduate students: Barriers to conducting qualitative research among vulnerable groups. The York University Student Journal of Anthropology, 3.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaäna, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Third edition.). SAGE Publications, Inc..

Nielsen, T., & Kreiner, S. (2018). Measuring statistical anxiety and attitudes toward statistics: The development of a comprehensive Danish instrument (HFS-R). Cogent Education, 5(1), 1521574. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1521574

O’Bryant, M., Natesan Batley, P., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2021). Validation of an Adapted Version of the Statistical Anxiety Scale in English and Its Relationship to Attitudes Toward Statistics. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211001378

Olave-Encina, K., Moni, K., & Renshaw, P. (2021). Exploring the emotions of international students about their feedback experiences. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(4), 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1786020

Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2013). Development and score-validation of the Research Anxiety Rating Scale. International Journal of Research in Education Methodology, 4(2), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijrem.v4i2.3927

Özdin, S., & Bayrak Özdin, Ş. (2020). Levels and predictors of anxiety, depression and health anxiety during COVID-19 pandemic in Turkish society: The importance of gender. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(5), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020927051

Sabti, A. A., Md Rashid, S., Nimehchisalem, V., & Darmi, R. (2019). The Impact of Writing Anxiety, Writing Achievement Motivation, and Writing Self-Efficacy on Writing Performance: A Correlational Study of Iraqi Tertiary EFL Learners. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019894289

Shelmerdine, A. J. (2018). Library Anxiety: Stories, Theories and Possible Solutions. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 67(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2018.1534281

Thummapol, O., Park, T., Jackson, M., & Barton, S. (2019). Methodological Challenges Faced in Doing Research With Vulnerable Women: Reflections From Fieldwork Experiences. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919843022

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Jurnal Tarbiyah provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Jurnal Tarbiyah Open Access articles are distributed under this CC BY SA.