THE EFFECT OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY ON STUDENTS GRAMMAR MASTERY AT MADRASAH ALWASLIYAH YPP RIDHO ALLAH KAMPUNG PERLABIAN

Penulis

  • Mentari Octa Department of English Education Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teachers Training State Islamic University of North Sumatera - Medan

Abstrak

The purpose of this study was to determine the significant effect of metacognitive strategies on grammar mastery of class XI students, especially in if conditional sentences . Type of research is using the method of research quantitative with the design of experiments . Researchers took data from the MADRASAH ALIYAH YPP RIDHO ALLAH, KAMPUNG PERLABIAN. The population in class XI is 40 students , and there are 2 classes . Each class has 20 students . The entire amount of the population of the sample in the study of this . In this study, there were 2 classes, namely the experimental class (XI-A) and the control class (XI-B) . Researchers gave a pretest before applying treatment and posttest after treatment. Then the researchers analyzed the data of the use of the formula statistic and Microsoft Excel with a level of significance 0 , 05 . Then the researcher gets the data from the study , namely The result is t count (8.55)> t table (1.69) which means that Ha is accepted while Ho is rejected. These results were obtained from the pretest and posttest scores of the students from the experimental class and the control class, where the posttest scores in the experimental class were higher than the control class . Can be concluded that Ha is accepted which is contained the influence of metacognitive strategies that significantly towards mastery of grammar studentsKeyword: metacognitive, grammar if conditional

Referensi

Andrew Radford,(2009). An Introduction to English Sentence Structure,New York: Cambridge University Press.

Arikunto,(2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik,Jakarta:Rineka Cipta

Blakey & Elaine Spence,Developing Metacognition. ERIC Digest, 1990, Diakses 18 Juli 2020, (www.tc.pbs.org.erictametacog).

Depatemen Pendidikan Nasional.(2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia,Edisi Keempat,Jakarta:Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Desmita.(2010).Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik.Jakarta:PT.Remaja

Drs. Syahrum,M.Pd. & Drs. Salim,M. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitaif. Bandung:Cita Pustaka Media.

Dyah, A. S. (2018). Efektivitas Strategy Metakognitif Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Geometris dan Self Efficacy.Skripsi:Tidak Diterbitkan.Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi.UIN Kalijaga.

Geoffrey B.,Christopher B.,Roger F.,Peter H.,Anita P.(2012).Teaching English As a Foreign Language.Taylor&Francis e-library:Newyork

Gleason,J.B & Ratner,N.B, (2009) The Development of Language,7th edition, Boston:Allyn and Bacon

Harmer,Jeremy.(1983),The Practice of English Language Teaching.New York:Longman

Jeni Wilson & Clark David.(2004).Toward the Modelling of Mathematical Metacognition. Mathematics Education Research Journal ;University of Melbourne,16,2

Lin,H.,C.(2010).A Case Study:An ESL Teachers Beliefs and Clasroom Practices.Kent State University:USA.

M. Firman Annur,I. S. (2016). Aktivitas Metakognisi Siswa Kelas X SMAN 1 TEMBILAHAN Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif.Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika.

M. Misa(2014).The Use Guided Metacognitive Strategy to Improve Reading Comprehension.Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora.

Martha Kolln and Robert Funk.(2010). Understanding English Grammar:8th :New York:Pearson.

Martinis Yamin,N,(2013). Strategi dan Metode dalam Model Pembelajaran,Jakarta: DP Press Group.

Masganti Sitorus. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Islam. IAIN Press,Medan.

Rodney Huddleston and Geoffery K. Pullum(2010), A Student’s Introduction to English Grammar, Newyork: Cambridge University Press

Richards, J.& Renandya, W.( 2002). Y in language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sandu, S, & Ali, S. (2015). Dasar metedologi penelitian.Yogyakarta: Media Publishing,

Sofan Amri & Iif Khoiru Ahmadi.(2010),Proses Pembelajaran Inovatif dan Kreatif dalam Kelas.Jakarta:PT.Prestasi Pusakarya

Sugiyono,(2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitaif,Kualitatif dan R&D.Bandung:Alfabeta.

Sukmadinata & As’ari.(2006). Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi di Perguruan Tinggi. Bandung : UPI.

Sukardi,(2013).Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan.Jakarta:Bumi Aksara.

Suratmi & A. S. Purnami.(2017). Pengaruh Strategi Metakognitif Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Persepsi Siswa Terhadap Pelajaran Matematika.Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika,05(02).

Talal Itani.(2012). The Qur’an:Translated to English by Talal Itani.Beirut:ClearQur’an.

Vertika, P.(2017). Pengaruh Kemampuan Metakognitif Terhadap Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Pemrograman Dasar. JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika).

Wina Sanjaya,(2008). Perencanaan & Desain Sistem pembelajaran,Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2021-07-28

Terbitan

Vol 1 No 1 (2021)

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Bright Vision Journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.