AN ANALYSIS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE FACE IN “THE CROODS MOVIE”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30829/vis.v15i2.620Abstrak
This study focuses on the management face in the conversation in the croods movie. This study was aimed at identifying a face management which is defined as any interaction word that is generally related to politeness. politeness is seen as a feature of interpersonal conduct whereby a person ‘shows regard for another person by trying to make that person feel comfortable or by making an obvious effort to avoid making that person feel uncomfortable’. Politeness is a feature of interpersonal conduct centered on the concept of face. The concept of face to a certain extent determines how a conversation can be conducted efficiently, effectively, and politely. This is descriptive and qualitative study is done under the scope of pragmatics that is implements theory of management face proposed by Goffman. It can be divide into two face; positive and negative face. The concepts of face in “the croods movie” discourse yield two concept namely positive and negative concepts. Positive face is the need to be accepted, even liked by others, to be treated as a member of the group and to know that his or her wants are shared by others. Negative face is the need to be independent to have a freedom of action and not to be imposed by others. The data obtained through movie of the croods with duration one half hour. After collecting the data, the writer identified and classified the data which are needed from the conversation specifically indicated positive and negative face. The finding of the study shows that are many conversation indicated positive and negative face, in this paper the writer only show five evident that showed to indicate positive and negative face.Referensi
Afiyati, A. 2013. Politeness Principle as Seen in The Dialogue Between Characters on “KARATE KID” Movie. English Department of Education Faculty State Institute of Islamic Studies (STAIN)
SALATIGA Unpublished Thesis
Allen, R.C., & Gomery, D.1993. Film History: Theory and Practice. NewYork: Mc Graw Hill
Ambuyo, B.A. 2011. Face Threatening Acts and Standing Orders: ‘Politeness’ or ‘politics' in the Question Time Discussions of the Kenyan Parliament. International Journal of Humanities and
Social Science Vol. I No. 9
Amberg, J.S & Vause, D.J. 2010. American English History, Structure, and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Başaran, B.C. 2013. Laughter as a Face Management Device In Turkish: Evidence From Turkish Spoken Corpus. Journal of Linguistics and Literature, Vol X. No.2. 10:2, P.75-100
Brown, P & Levinson, S.C. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J.2011. Politeness and Impoliteness. In: Karin Aijmer and Gisle Andersen (eds.) Sociopragmatics, Volume 5 of Handbooks of Pragmatics edited by Wolfram Bublitz, Andreas H.
Jucker and Klaus P. Schneider. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 391-436
Creswell, J. W. 2002. Research design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed methods Approaches 2nd
Edition. USA: Sage Publication, inc.
Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
Haugh, M. & Michael, C,H. 2003. A Metalinguistic Approach to Deconstructing the Concepts of 'Face' and 'Politeness' in Chinese, English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics Vol XXXV. No. 10/11: P. 1581-1611
Haugh, M. 2007. The Discursive Challenge to Politeness Theory: an Interactional Alternative. Journal of Politeness Research, Vol III. P. 295–317.
Holmes, J. 2005. Politeness and Postmodernism - an Appropriate Approach to the Analysis of Language and Gender? Journal of Sociolinguistics. Vol IX. No.1 P. 108-117.
Holmet, J. 2013. An Introduction to Sociolinguistic 6th Edition. London and New York: Long Man.
Kedveš, A. 2013. Face Threatening Acts and Politeness Strategies in Summer School Application Calls. Vol XIV. No.2-3 P. 431-444
Keyton, J. (2011). Communication and organizational culture: A key to understanding work experience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Khorshidi, Hassan Rasouli. 2013. Politeness in Study Abroad. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences. Vol, V. No.3. P 324-333. S
Levinson, S.C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mey, L. Jacob. 1993. Pragmatics – An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
Suzila, T.I & Yusri, M. N. 2012. Politeness: Adolescents in Disagreements. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. II, No. 2
Thomas, J. 1996. Meaning in interaction: an introduction to pragmatics. London and New York: Longman
Widdowson, H.G. 1978. Teaching Language Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vilkki, L.2006. Politeness, Face and Facework: Current Issues. SKY Journal of Linguistic. Vol XIX.P.322-332
Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. London: Oxford University Press
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with VISION agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
